The Robotic Takeover: Building Tomorrow’s Solar Farms Today

In comic books, robots take center stage—saving humanity, waging wars, and even questioning their own existence. But in reality, they’re quietly revolutionising industries. Real game-changing robots are out in the sun, installing solar panels at a pace humans could never match, with precision, speed, and the potential to transform how we navigate our world. Enter automation, a groundbreaker for the renewable energy sector.

At the heart of this innovation is Maximo, a robot developed by AES Corporation. Maximo uses a combination of artificial intelligence (AI), computer vision, and an extendable arm equipped with suction cups to lift and position solar panels with precision. Roughly the size of a pickup truck, Maximo can install solar panels twice as fast as human workers and at half the cost. It operates tirelessly in harsh environments like the California desert, where it is set to be deployed for large-scale solar-plus-battery projects. The robot’s design enhances speed and accuracy and allows for continuous operation, overcoming limitations posed by human labour. This is a critical advancement as solar energy companies seek to meet the increasing demand for renewable power while grappling with workforce shortages.

There are numerous advantages of using robots in solar panel installation. First and foremost, they offer substantial cost savings. By automating a labour-intensive process, companies can reduce the overall expense of building solar farms, which makes renewable energy more affordable for consumers.

Another key benefit is safety. Working in challenging environments is another area where robots have proven their worth. In regions like Australia’s outback, where solar farms such as the Bungala Solar Project are located, the extreme heat and harsh conditions pose significant risks to human workers. With robots handling the most strenuous tasks, companies are improving worker safety by reducing the number of people exposed to dangerous conditions. Furthermore, automation would open the door to scaling up renewable energy projects. Robots can work 24/7, unlike human workers, ensuring projects remain on schedule despite workforce limitations.

This has the potential to drive a significant increase in solar energy production, helping countries meet ambitious climate goals and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. This automation could also inspire further innovations, with more specialised robots being developed for tasks such as cleaning, inspecting, and maintaining solar panels.

Looking ahead, this technological shift could reshape the renewable energy landscape, making solar power more accessible and widespread. As automation continues to evolve, it will become a cornerstone of efforts to combat climate change by accelerating the transition to green energy. The EU’s Horizon Europe, which aims to support large-scale solar projects across Europe, also highlights the role automation can play in meeting renewable energy goals. Projects like the Núñez de Balboa Solar Power Plant in Spain, which is the largest solar farm in Europe, show how automation could be instrumental in achieving the EU’s targets for carbon neutrality by 2050. By deploying robots for panel installation and maintenance, the speed and scale of these projects could be greatly enhanced.

As much as the potential benefits of robotic solar panel installation are exciting, significant challenges remain. The initial cost of developing and deploying these robots is high, which may slow down adoption, especially for smaller companies. Additionally, robots still require oversight and maintenance, meaning that human workers will continue to play a role in the process, albeit in a more supervisory capacity. There is also the issue of technical limitations. Not all solar farm sites are uniform, and robots may struggle in environments with uneven terrain or complex layouts. While robots like Maximo excel in large, flat desert sites, further advancements will be needed to make them adaptable to a broader range of conditions.

Legal and regulatory hurdles are significant issues for robotic deployment in solar installation. For example, the Núñez de Balboa Solar Power Plant must navigate stringent EU labour laws and regulations. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), for example, comes into play with the use of AI-driven robots like Maximo. Compliance with GDPR requires companies to ensure that personal and sensitive data collected during operations is adequately protected and not misused.

Robotic automation has raised concerns about workforce displacement, especially in regions where jobs in renewable energy are a key part of the local economy. The European Social Charter plays a similar role, as it ensures workers’ rights are protected, including the right to fair working conditions. Renewable energy projects must address how automation may affect employment and must negotiate with labour unions to avoid conflicts.

The use of robots in solar panel installation is part of a larger trend toward automation and sustainability in the construction and energy sectors. As industries strive to reduce their carbon footprints, automation offers a pathway to streamline operations while minimising environmental impact. For the renewable energy industry, automation is not just about cutting costs—it is also about making the energy transition happen faster and more effectively.

Robots like Maximo represent a glimpse into the future of construction and renewable energy. As technology advances, we can expect to see even more sophisticated systems emerge, reshaping the way solar farms are built and operated. This shift will not only help solve current challenges but will also pave the way for a more sustainable, energy-efficient future.

©Whitestone Chambers.

The UK’s £2.3 Billion Fraud Epidemic: Will New Reimbursement Rules Backfire?

The UK lost an estimated £2.3 billion to fraud in 2023 – a staggering 104% increase from 2022. Fraud can have a devastating impact on individuals, exacerbating disadvantage, vulnerability, and inequality. It also erodes trust in businesses and government programs, damaging the UK’s international and economic reputation.

Authorised Push Payment (APP) Fraud

APP fraud, the most common type of financial scam in the UK, uses social engineering tactics to trick individuals and businesses into sending money under false pretences. One common example is when fraudsters impersonate HMRC, threatening victims with bogus fines ahead of self-assessment deadlines. In 2023 alone, APP fraud cost the UK economy approximately £459 million.

Reimbursements for APP Fraud

In the past, a number of banks operated voluntary reimbursement schemes for APP fraud. More recently, in recognition of its prevalence, the Financial Services and Markets Bill 2023 established mandatory rules requiring banks and payment firms to reimburse victims for APP scams – with the costs shared among involved firms.

The new rules specifically addressed Faster Payments — a platform that has allowed fraudsters more time to move funds before transactions are flagged, making recovery more difficult. As such, Faster Payments has become the platform of choice for APP scammers. Despite presenting positive changes for victims, the implementation of these new rules is inevitably facing teething issues.

Unintended Consequences

Some have voiced concerns that criminals have already taken advantage of the voluntary reimbursement of APP fraud previously offered by banks. This might involve collusion between a criminal payer and payee, arranged solely to claim mandatory compensation from the banks involved.

Under the new rules, payment companies are now obligated to reimburse customers for fraud, with limited grounds for refusal. The primary exception is when victims fail to meet the ‘consumer standard of caution,’ meaning they are careless about paying unintended recipients. That said, large firms might compensate clients even where this is not met so as to avoid adverse publicity. This is something unlikely to be matched by smaller outfits – widening the gap between large and small payment firms in how they deal with fraud.

Lawyers have warned of the opportunities for organised crime: for example, large Ponzi schemes where dozens of individuals make payments. If a small payments firm was faced with 25 payments of up to £85,000 each, it may have to pay out up to £1m in mandatory compensation.

Balancing the Rights of Victims and Payment Firms

To address these concerns, the Payments Association have suggested introducing a £30,000 reimbursement cap and requiring a police report for larger payments before reimbursement decisions. This approach could help balance victim protection with minimising opportunities for fraudsters to game the system. It is claimed that this would encompass 95% of fraud cases.

It remains uncertain whether these measures will effectively deter organised crime, or if smaller caps will encourage a surge in false claims. Mandatory reimbursement, while well-intentioned, opens the door to a new form of profitable fraud. If unchecked, this could not only fail to address APP fraud but also overwhelm payment firms with fraudulent claims, ultimately increasing scrutiny on legitimate victims.

Striking the right balance is essential—ensuring victims of APP fraud are fairly compensated while maintaining a just reimbursement system that doesn’t incentivise criminal exploitation.

If you or your business has been affected by APP fraud, or if you are seeking legal guidance in navigating these new regulations, contact our team for expert counsel.

©Whitestone Chambers.